[Yocasta M.] v. Kijakazi (S.D. Fla. Jan. 31, 2024) - visual impairment, waiver of right to counsel, subjective complaints, mental RFC None of those activities

None of those activities

1) The Commissioner failed to properly address the impact of Appellant’s treatment regimen on her ability to perform sustained work activities

Beale and Bernstein cannot be so classified

in which Judges Wynn and Floyd joined)

1) Whether the ALJ’s reasons for finding the opinion of Dr

[Yocasta M.] v. Kijakazi (S.D. Fla. Jan. 31, 2024) - visual impairment, waiver of right to counsel, subjective complaints, mental RFC None of those activities[Yocasta M.] v. Kijakazi, No. 22 24081 CV, 2024 WL 1178961 (S. D. Fla. Jan. 31, 2024), report and recommendation adopted in part, rejected in part, No. 22 24081 CIV, 2024 WL 1131041 (S. D. Fla. Mar. 15, 2024) (Decision by U. S. District Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. and U. S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodan) Briefs Included: Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs Reply Brief, Plaintiffs Objections to Magistrate Judges Report and