Nikita M. v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Feb. 21, 2024) - interacting with supervisors, medical opinions, subjective complaints, lay evidence, sentence 6 remands 2023 WL 2136429 (M

2023 WL 2136429 (M

Acquiescence Ruling 97-4(9)

Vocational testimony - inconsistency with the DOT

Failure to follow treatment

the court found Shelley C

Nikita M. v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Feb. 21, 2024) - interacting with supervisors, medical opinions, subjective complaints, lay evidence, sentence 6 remands 2023 WL 2136429 (MNikita M. v. OMalley, No. 2: 23 CV 10722 (D. N. J. Feb. 21, 2024) (Order by U. S. Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief and remand order Topics addressed: RFC interacting with co workers, supervisors and the public Medical opinions supportability Medical opinions articulation requirements Testimony of lay witnesses Subjective symptoms regulatory factors Subjective symptoms required finding Mental domains interacting