the court will not affirm “simply because some rationale might have supported the ALJ’s conclusion
to be “unpersuasive” are not supported by substantial evidence
Without some reasonable explanation from the ALJ as to why completing basic household chores is inconsistent with a finding of disability
at 1104 (citing Winschel
3) The ALJ failed to properly consider the statements of Plaintiff’s parents as required by SSR 11-2p
[Brian R.] v. Kijakazi (W.D. La. Sept. 13, 2022) - drug & alcohol abuse, RFC, subjective complaints the court will not affirm[Brian R.] v. Kijakazi, No. CV 3: 21 00750, 2022 WL 4230247 (W. D. La. Aug. 29, 2022), report and recommendation adopted, No. CV 3: 21 00750, 2022 WL 4227881 (W. D. La. Sept. 13, 2022) (R&R by U. S. Magistrate Kayla Dye McClusky, adopted by U. S. District Judge Terry A. Doughty) Briefs for purchase: Appellants Initial Brief and Appellants Reply Brief Topics addressed: RFC relationship with PRTF findings RFC interacting with co workers, supervisors and